Selection bias occurs when you try to determine whether a new pizza business in town is any good by asking only those who enjoy pizza. You're losing out on the viewpoints of individuals who don't like pizza or have had a poor experience. As a result of hearing from a few people, your judgment may be distorted.
Enough with the pizza now. In more technical terms, selection bias occurs when the sample under research is not representative of the entire population of interest. It's like selecting who gets to participate in a research or poll, but those choices don't fully reflect the larger population you're attempting to comprehend. This might skew your results because you're not seeing the whole picture.
Think about taking a stroll through a funfair and entering a hall that’s adorned with mirrors. Every mirror, with its body and frame, reflects a reality type; one elongated, another short and stout. Selection bias in audience research is also a performer which twists the face of your target market according to the way samples are chosen. It is an unintended distortion that brings about wrong assumptions, just as well as thinking that you look that way from the reflection in a funhouse mirror.
Garter had once pointed out “By 2022 more than 40% of all data analytics projects will focus on the customer experience.” This forecast reminds us of an important aspect of effective audience research in shaping customer experience. Nevertheless, if the data collection biases are not dealt with, the companies will be exposed to making decisions on misleading information.
Selection bias can manifest in various forms, each distorting the researcher’s lens in unique ways. Let us take a look at them:
It is manifested when specific groups are overrepresented in research. Picture, for example, fishing with a net that only catches large fish and ignores the little fish, the same way the sampling bias overlooks some of your audience.
Occurring when people volunteer for a study, resulting in a sample that may not be representative of the general population. This is just like only hearing the loudest singing birds yet missing the soft chirps.
This is the type of bias where researchers ignore the ‘dropouts’ or are less successful. Now, imagine considering only the plants that did well in strong light and forgetting about those which failed.
This bias occurs when data collecting timing chooses who or what is included in the sample. It is as though you are painting a landscape from a single moment, losing the glamor of other seasons.
But what does a selection bias look like in real life? Here are two examples to make you understand the concept even better:
Example 1: A fitness app company carries out a survey on the exercise habits of people who use their app only. This ignores the view of non-users or those who found the app inappropriate, like asking only the swimmers about the ocean’s depth, forgetting those standing on the shore.
Example 2: A retailer brand obtains customer's feedback on a new product by sending an email survey. Yet this approach leaves out the reckonings of those who buy in-store or do not subscribe to emails, much like basing the popularity of a book on the sales of just one bookshop and disregarding countless other readers.
Xebo.ai becomes a lighthouse in the middle of the fog of biased data as it strives to obtain a real portrait of the market. With the help of AI and machine learning, Xebo.ai assists companies in expanding the scope of their audience research to capture a representative sample.
Xebo.ai is like the artiste making a lens through which the actual picture can be seen, clearing away the alienations of selection bias. Using immense datasets to ascertain trends emerging from intersecting user behaviors, Xebo.ai offers an overview of the audience landscape in as much as this process is not bound by standard sampling restrictions.
Beyond leveraging technology, there are practical steps businesses can take to avoid the carnival mirror effect of selection bias: Beyond leveraging technology, there are practical steps businesses can take to avoid the carnival mirror effect of selection bias:
Stretch your limits further than just one single method of data gathering. Employ a combination of surveys, interviews, social media listening and analytics to harvest a broad range of insights.
Always use random sampling methods during participant selection in your research. This way, all possible respondents have the same probability of being included, as in a lottery.
Audience research is, though, more than an one-time event but an ongoing. Continuously review and update your research criteria and methods to adjust to market and consumer behavior changes.
Think about the timeline of your research. Ensure that it does not interfere with events or seasons that may influence who is able or willing to participate.
As Maya Angelou once said, “Do the best you can until you know better. Then, when you know better, do better.” This philosophy is very useful in combating selection bias. Conditioned to perception and armed with appropriate instruments such as Xebo.ai, businesses will clean up distortions and obtain correct ratings, and determinations made based on such ratings will be informed.
By leaving the carnival of twisted mirrors and approaching that clear image of your audience, you raise the game of market research. By doing so, you not only improve the customer experience but also create a new route to ongoing growth and prosperity in the changing market scenario.
Schedule a Free Demo today and turn your detractors into promotors
Selection bias skews research findings by presenting a biased image of the population under study, resulting in conclusions that may not properly reflect reality. It weakens the validity and generalizability of findings by emphasizing particular qualities or groups over others.
Common examples of selection bias include self-selection bias, in which participants volunteer for a research, resulting in non-representative samples, and survivorship bias, in which only surviving subjects are included, distorting outcomes by removing those who did not survive.
It is difficult to totally eradicate selection bias since it frequently arises from intrinsic constraints in research design or data gathering methods. Researchers can reduce it by employing randomization approaches, rigorous participant selection criteria, and honest reporting of study methodologies to improve the study's validity and reliability.
